chkrootkit (part #4)

In chkrootkit

 #define MAX_ID 99999

 int main(int argc, char*argv[]) {
        int             fh_wtmp;
        int             fh_lastlog;
        struct lastlog  lastlog_ent;
        struct utmp     utmp_ent;
        long            userid[MAX_ID];

...

        for (i=0; i<MAX_ID; i++)
                userid[i]=FALSE;

...

                if (*uid > MAX_ID)
                {
                   fprintf(stderr, "MAX_ID is %ld and current uid is %ld, please check\n\r", (long int)MAX_ID, (long int)*uid );
                   exit (1);

                }

uid gets set by getpwnam(). On modern systems, it can be 32bits. Much higher than MAX_ID of 99999. If your backdoored account has a high uid, it won't be detected in lastlog/wtmp rootkit detection.

This is not unusually bad of chkrootkit. It's just old code that hasn't been maintained.

Popular posts from this blog

Empowering Women in Cybersecurity: InfoSect's 2024 Training Initiative

 InfoSect has always been committed to fostering diversity and inclusion within the cybersecurity industry, with a special focus on encouraging those who identify as women to excel in the technical streams. We're excited to announce that in 2024, we're taking our commitment to the next level. Following the resounding success of our 2022 initiative, we are proud to double our efforts and expand our training opportunities for women in cybersecurity. HackerChix: Uniting Women in Cybersecurity In 2017, InfoSect introduced HackerChix, a vibrant community that provides a platform for women to connect, support, and inspire one another in the world of cybersecurity. This initiative has been a constant presence at BSides Canberra every year.   Doubling Down on Education To empower more women with the knowledge and skills needed to excel in cybersecurity, InfoSect is thrilled to announce a significant expansion of its training offerings in 2024. Thanks to the generous sponsorshi
Read more

C++ Memory Corruption (std::string) - part 4

  Summary This is the next part of the C++ memory corruption series*. In this post, we'll look at corrupting the std:string object in Linux and see what exploitation primitives we can gain. * https://blog.infosectcbr.com.au/2020/08/c-memory-corruption-part-1.html * https://blog.infosectcbr.com.au/2022/01/c-memory-corruption-stdvector-part-2.html  *  https://blog.infosectcbr.com.au/2022/03/c-memory-corruption-stdlist-part-3.html Author: Dr Silvio Cesare Introduction C++ is a common language for memory corruption. However, there is much more literature on exploiting C programs and little on C++ programs. C++ presents new classes, objects, and data structures which can all be effectively used for building exploitation primitives. In this post, we'll look at corrupting the std::string class and see what specific primitives we can obtain. std::string We note that the object stored in memory for a basic string consists firstly of the backing pointer to the string contents. Se
Read more

Pointer Compression in V8

Image
Syed Faraz Abrar @farazsth98   Summary In this blog post, I will provide some details on how the Chromium developers implemented pointer compression in V8. I will also talk about what this means from an exploit development perspective. Introduction I’ve been an intern at InfoSect for the past couple of weeks now, and in this time, I’ve had to do a bunch of security related research into both V8 and Spidermonkey. One of the things that I spent a short amount of my time on was pointer compression in V8. I hadn’t heard of the term at all until Bruno Keith ( @bkth_ ) mentioned it on twitter some time in December last year. The V8 developers also made a blog post to celebrate V8 v8.0 where they mentioned that implementing pointer compression had allowed them to save up to 40% in usage of heap memory! That’s a big improvement, so let’s take a look at what pointer compression is and what it means from an exploit developer’s perspective. Disclaimer This is not intended to
Read more